'Addressing the Community Leadership Challenges Faced by Women Leaders of Sitio Galilee, Antipolo Essay\r'

'This 2012 topic explores the company leadinghip of women in the locale of Sitio Galilee in Antipolo City. regular(a) though the standards of leadinghip hang in to be male-oriented, more(prenominal) women be fetching up leading positions in our nightclub. The usual aim of this speculate is to identify the ch on the wholeenges that these women leadership flavor toward using in their fellowship; more importantly, how these can be cut throughed. The study mainly sought to (1) identify and get word the lead challenges that women leaders face in initiating increment in their lodge, and (2) allay or assist possible accomplishment programs that pull up s dispenses address these challenges. To resolve this issue, the shapees of the Participatory serve Research (PAR) were followed, namely:\r\n(1) diagnosing the term of women’s involvement and leadership in the friendship, (2) planning of run programs that will address the identified leadership challen ges, (3) its implementation and monitoring, and (4) the evaluation. The accounts of women leaders and the perceptions of the members were collected through sensation-on- whiz inter go steadys. In addition, focus group discussions were conducted to encourage mickle’s participation. Guided by the affectionate Role Theory, the office of the women as lodge leaders is and analyzed. This study is a contributory divisor to theoreticians and confederacy education practiti onenessrs in analyzing the unaddressed issues of fraternity leadership.\r\n master more: My Writing Process analyze\r\nKeywords: Women and leadership, union leadership, federation discipline, Participatory challenge Research\r\nBackground of the Study Traditionally, friendship affairs and administration oblige been the theatre of influence of men. Hassan (2008) explains that â€Å"this is evident from the im rest of leaders and office be atomic number 18rs crossways community, local councils and associations.” Silong (2008) as well as pointed out that â€Å"women pee non been dynamical in local politics and atomic number 18 relatively inactive in reality emergencees due to institutional, socio-economic and cultural constraints.”\r\nIn the annals of the Philippines, women portrayed essential subprograms, non scarcely in the facet of taking carry off of the family but also in the development of the life of the tribe during the pre-colonial clock (Shah, 2007). With the root of colonization, it brought about a patriarchal union wherein women were made inferior to men and be not licensed to certain rights (Clamonte, 2007). However, condemnations ar changing. in that respect is now adoption that women can do and act as a prodigious consumption in community affairs, particularly in contributing to the exertion of community development and progress.\r\nNowadays, stories of women occupying leadership positions atomic number 18 becoming ordinary. Although regarded by Zaharah and Silong (2008) as â€Å"the unidentified heroes of community action”, women’s fictitious character in community leadership has bend increasingly important. In certain communities, they already learned the knowledge and skill that have produced positive transformation to their community (Bond, Holmes, Byrne, Babchuck, & angstrom unit; Kirton-Robbins, 2008). More importantly, they have established themselves as community leaders. However, many be not aware of the challenges that these women leaders face.\r\nIn view of this, the researcher learned, through the ocular gabble that all the community leaders of Sitio Galilee, Antipolo are women. Their husbands solve in the city and nevertheless come mansion for the weekend. Hence, their weekdays are worn out(p) at caring for the family, doing sufferhold chores, day-by-day chatting in the neighborhood and playing brainpower games. Above all this, they also practice to plan and wor k concerning community affairs. The researcher sought to barely investigate on the women’s leadership in the community, specifically on the challenges they encounter.\r\nResearch Objectives\r\nThe women leaders in the community of Sitio Galilee, Antipolo face several leadership challenges that need to be addressed. How can the community of Sitio Galilee, Antipolo address these? Specifically, this study sought to:\r\n1. discover the status of women’s involvement and leadership in the community; 2. Identify the leadership challenges faced by women leaders towards community development; 3. Initiate the planning of action programs that will address the identified leadership challenges; 4. Implement the action program and facilitate its monitoring; and 5. Evaluate the effectiveness of the action programs.\r\nSignificance of the Study\r\nThis study serves its implication for two aspects: theoretical and practical. Firstly, this study is channelize by the Social Role possi bility. This possibleness emphasizes on the processes of role-taking and role-making as part of an soulfulness’s life. Accompanied by these processes is the role conflict which may develop as one struggle different coincidental roles. This study improves the clarity and applicability of the theory as it is used by a researcher.\r\nThis study is a contributory factor to the residents of Sitio Galilee, Antipolo in broadening their understanding of the leadership bulwarks that their women leaders are encountering. This Participatory challenge Research assists them in the process of maximum participation of the community, through initiating action programs, in addressing the identified challenges. Hence, this study promotes and encourages community development in the locale.\r\nThis study is affiliated with the University of Santo Tomas and its Simbahayan Office. This is a useful document in analyzing and addressing the issues of community leadership inside their partner c ommunities.\r\n arena and Delimitation\r\nThe scope of this research is the women leaders in Sitio Galilee, Antipolo. This study focused on the role of women in leadership and community development, the identification of the determined leadership barriers towards development in their community, and most significantly the process wherein these challenges were addressed.\r\nThis study did not cover separate factors, other than leadership per se, that impede the process of development and progress in the community of Sitio Galilee. A constructivist worldview was applied. This implies that the researcher seeks to establish the marrow of a phenomenon from the views of the instrumentalists. In this endeavor, the journeys of women leaders were redact forth and determined by the participants. Furthermore, the action programs use came from the propositions of the participants. The researcher only served as facilitator and participant observer of the said approach.\r\nTheoretical mana kin Individuals have several roles that they play across time and array within the distributor point of life. fit to Burr (1972), â€Å"throughout life, individuals ship into and out of different roles, keeping some, difference others behind, and beginning new roles.”\r\nThis study is channelise by the Social Role Theory. This is not just a single theory; rather this was established through interrelating and interconnecting perspectives. iodin of the pioneers of this theory is George Herbert Mead’s â€Å"role-taking”. It explains that the ability to portion oneself in another’s place is an essential development of the ‘self’ (Ritzer, 2000).\r\nAccording to this theory, â€Å" kindly role is a serve of rights, duties, expectations, norms and behavior a person has to face and to fulfill.” Linton (1936) explained that, as cited in the study of Harrison and lynch (2005), â€Å"the role represents the sum total of all various role s of an individual, and determines what one does for the society and one may expect from it.”\r\nIn this sense, â€Å"roles do not remain static, but transpose and evolve over time”, as stated by Turner (1990). There is the impression of â€Å"role-taking” where an individual acquires or takes on the role of other individuals; and â€Å"role-making” wherein one is suit adequate to create and recreate these roles (Turner, 1990).\r\nIn undergoing these processes, one may experience â€Å"role overburden” and â€Å"role conflict”. Turner (1990) defines role overload as, â€Å"the experience of lacking the resources, including time and energy, needed to visit the demands of all roles.” On the other hand, role conflict is be by Turner (1990) as, â€Å"an incongruity mingled with the expectations of one role and those of another.” However, there is the so called â€Å"role balance”. Role balance is a state wherein an indi vidual is able to perform his or her roles well and meet its expectations (Marks & MacDermid, 1996).\r\nTo show how the complaisant role theory is applied in this study of the leadership challenges of women leaders, the researcher conceptualized a prototype that illustrate how the multiple roles (with its linked rights, duties and expectations to it) of a woman contribute to the challenges they face.\r\nLiterature reexamination\r\nGender role encapsulates the characteristics and behaviors that are autocratic as either manful or feminine (Bem, 1974; Clamonte, 2007). Carli and Eagly (2001) have enumerated:\r\nThe set of traits and behaviors tagged as masculine implicates the following: is self-reliant, independent, and assertive, has leadership abilities, is willing to take risks, makes finales easily, is dominant, is willing to take a stand, acts like a leader, and is athletic, ambitious, and self-sufficient. The set of traits and behaviors labeled as feminine include the se: is affectionate, compassionate, and cheerful, does not use harsh language, is loyal, afflictive to the needs of others, sympathetic, gentle, and understanding, loves children, and is tender and warm.\r\nTannen (1990) pointed out that, â€Å"the handed-down gender role is a social orientation that emphasizes closeness and solidarity, whereas the traditional masculine gender role is a social orientation that emphasized power and status.” In sociology, gender roles are considered ‘artifactual’ or socially constructed ideals in the society. Eagly (2002) has characterized this as a â€Å"male-advantaged gender hierarchy.” The roles associated to men benefited them more than the women’s. They gained more vex to resources, authority in decision makings and more s business deals in the administration (Kolb, 1999).\r\nIn the Philippines, women enjoyed distinguished equality in the society during the pre-colonial times (Santos-Maranan, Parreno, & F abros, 2006). Shah (2007) explicated that, â€Å"Filipinos have bring in kinship bilaterally.” Some of the rights they experienced are: (1) they were entitled to the properties of their family, (2) instigate divorce of their husbands, (3) use up in trading and a lot more privileges (Clamonte, 2007).\r\nHowever, the coming of the Spaniards that brought about the indoctrination of universality has downgraded the role of Filipino women (Shah, 2007). The spirit of the indigen Filipina was reassignd. Shah (2007) expounded that, â€Å"the image of the Filipino women became tied to the house whose only duty was to take wangle of the husband and the children.” Alesina, Nunn and Giuliano (2011) also added, â€Å"It also became a father’s good girl, a husband’s subject, and a resignation woman with sealed lips and silent sobs and has not right to participate political undertakings.”\r\nIn the countrified area, the Filipino woman belongs in the home. F lavier (2007) described in his book, Doctor to the Barrios, that â€Å"rural women in the Philippines wield considerable authority, the lady of the house in particular.” According to him, the housewife is actually some(prenominal) called as the â€Å"Reyna ng Tahanan”.\r\nA new-fangled writing by Vartii (2011) revealed that, â€Å"there is a re-emergence of the empowerment of Filipino women though the political process.” In the present times, women in the Philippines are reviving the strengths they lost. Women now are seen working outback(a) the home and occupying the prominent positions in their own field. Many fifty-fifty finagle to become leaders. Fabros (2005) affirmed, â€Å"No matter what kinds of issues they (women) are involved in at present, one thing is clear †they are the very testimony of a better Philippines.”\r\nThe second-wave womens lib and radical feminism have remedied the traditional issues on gender (Cornell, 1998 in Pfl anz, 2011). plane though there was a significant development of the status of women in the twentieth century, there’s still much to be done to fully change the social beliefs regarding this matter. Carly and Eagly (2001) argues that, â€Å"women continue to lack access to power and leadership compared with men.” There is this phenomenon called â€Å" scum ceiling”. Coleman (2003) defines this as â€Å"a barrier that is impenetrable to women.” Pflanz (2011) mentioned in his study that, â€Å"Studies involving women in leadership roles indicate the majority of women consider their biggest obstacle to advancement is a mental capacity favoring candidates that fit in a male-dominated environment.”\r\nEven though the standards of leadership persist to be male-oriented, more women are taking up leadership positions in our society (Pflanz, 2011). Pflanz (2011) further explained that, â€Å"many women assume leadership positions in order to have an influ ence within their communities.”\r\nThe Department of Communities of the Queensland Government (2006) stated that, â€Å" fellowship leadership is leadership in, for and by the community.” Ferrer (2010) affirms, â€Å"it reflects the concept of pack and groups working together to discover common vision and goals.” Community leadership is not profit-oriented and therefore involves non-paid leaders (Baconguis, 2010). In the study of Garina (1957), he revealed that, â€Å"non-paid local leaders are vital in community action; cooperation with them by outside agencies is despotic in the process of community development.”\r\nWomen’s participation in the communities and national exposure was not only through globe leadership. In many cases, women form the headstone of formations as members or volunteers, particularly at the community level. There are many examples of this point: barangay health workers, churchwomen, community mobilizers, members of p eople’s organizations and civic organizations †over and to a higher place their traditional roles as domestic managers/housekeepers, caregivers, and even as they engage in arable labor outside the domestic sector (Bond, Holmes, Byrne, Babchuck, & Kirton-Robbins, 2008).\r\nThe report on the fabrication on Women nongovernmental organization Managers in 1987 entitled, â€Å"Women NGO Managers: Issues and Dilemmas” revealed that women NGO managers play multiple roles and have triple responsibility of caring for the home and children, earning a living/working outside the home and contributing to the national development. It showed that these women experience a major dilemma on how to balance and integrate the concerns of family life and the demands of work/career commitment. These pressures on family-work commitments are further magnified by leadership roles that women play in their organization (PHILDHRRA, 1987).\r\n'